ANALISIS KOGNITIVISME DAN KONSTRUKTIVISME TERHADAP KRISIS LITERASI DAN KESENJANGAN DIGITAL
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61722/jinu.v3i4.10417Keywords:
Cognitivism, Constructivism, Literacy, Digital Divide, EducationAbstract
Education in Indonesia faces the dual challenge of low cognitive literacy levels and significant disparities in digital access. According to PISA 2022 data, Indonesian students' literacy scores remain below the OECD average, indicating barriers to cognitive information processing. This article aims to analyze this problem through the perspectives of cognitive and constructivist learning theories. The method used is a case study based on secondary data with a qualitative descriptive approach, drawing on sources from national media, government reports, and scientific journals. The analysis indicates that low literacy is caused by cognitive workloads that are inappropriate for students' developmental stages, while the digital divide hinders the scaffolding process in learning. This article recommends simplifying the curriculum based on cognitive abilities and equalizing access to technology as an effort to create meaningful and inclusive learning.
References
Buku
Vygotsky, L. S.( 1978). Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Aunurrahman.( 2019). Belajar serta Pendidikan. Bandung: Alfabeta.
Schunk, D. H.( 2012). Learning Theories: An Educational Perspective( 6th ed.). Boston: Pearson.
Jurnal Ilmiah
Hattie, J.( 2017). Visible Learning: A Synthesis of Over 800 Meta- Analyses Relating to Achievement. Journal of Education.
Mayer, R. E.( 2020). Multimedia Learning and the Cognitive Theory of Multimedia Learning. Educational Psychology Review, 32( 4).
Muis, A.( 2024). Implementasi Konstruktivisme dalam Pendidikan Jarak Jauh di Indonesia. Harian Pembelajaran Nasional, 12( 1).
Sidauruk, J. Meter.( 2025). The Impact of Digital Divide on Student Cognitive Development in Developing Nations. International Journal of Educational Reform, 34( 2)
Sweller, J.( 2019). Cognitive Load Theory and Educational Technology. Educational Psychology Review, 31( 1).
Laporan Resmi dan Data
Asosiasi Penyelenggara Jasa Internet Indonesia( APJII).( 2025). Laporan Penetrasi Internet Indonesia 2024- 2025. Jakarta: APJII. 1
Kemendikbudristek.( 2024). Analisis Hasil PISA 2022: Penilaian Strategis Pembelajaran Nasional. Jakarta: Pusat Asesmen Pembelajaran.
OECD.( 2023). PISA 2022 Results: Learning During and From Disruption. Paris: OECD Publishing.
UNESCO.( 2022). Global Education Monitoring Report: Technology in Education. Paris: UNESCO.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 JURNAL ILMIAH NUSANTARA

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.











