Analisis Yuridis Sengketa Harta Bersama Pasca Perceraian dalam Putusan Mahkamah Agung No. 1996 K/Pdt/2012

Ramadhani dwi pangestu; Mega Dewi Ambarwati

doi:10.61722/jmia.v2i4.5608

Authors

Ramadhani dwi pangestu Universitas 17 Agustus 1945 Surabaya
Mega Dewi Ambarwati Universitas 17 Agustus 1945 Surabaya

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61722/jmia.v2i4.5608

Keywords:

Harta Bersama, Perceraian, Putusan Mahkamah Agung, Gono-gini, Keadilan Substantif, Kompilasi Hukum Islam, Pembuktian Hukum

Abstract

This paper analyzes the Supreme Court's decision Number 1996 K/Pdt/2012 regarding the post-divorce joint property dispute between Budi Santosa and Yenny Tjiamudjaja. Joint property or gono-gini problems are often a source of conflict in divorce, especially when there is no separation of property agreement. This study uses a normative legal method with a qualitative approach to court decisions and positive legal provisions, such as Article 35 paragraph (1) of the Marriage Law and Article 97 of the Compilation of Islamic Law. The results of the analysis show that the Supreme Court prioritizes the principles of in dubio pro matrimonio and substantive justice in determining the status of property as joint property, and rejects the Defendant's arguments that have not been legally proven. This decision emphasizes the importance of proving the origin of property in civil cases, while also providing an important precedent in family law regarding the division of assets after divorce.

References

Mutmainna, K. Karim, and M. A. F. Syahril, “Simplifikasi Pembagian Harta Gono-Gini Akibat Perceraian,” J. litigasi Amsir, vol. 9, no. November, pp. 1–12, 2021.

P. H. G. Dan, P. Hak, and A. Anak, “jm_lexcrimen,+12.+Eni+C.+Singal,” vol. VI, no. 5, pp. 90–97, 2017.

B. Nagara, “Pembagian Harta Gono-Gini Atau Harta Bersama Setelah Perceraian Menurut Undang-Undang Nomor 1 Tahun 1974,” Lex Crim., vol. 5, no. 7, pp. 51–57, 2016.

Suparyanto dan Rosad (2015, “Penyelesaian Sengketa Harta Bersama Berstatus Agunan Dalam Perkara Perceraian Di Pengadilan Negeri,” Suparyanto dan Rosad (2015, vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 248–253, 2020.

B. Laksita, R. Luhri, P. Studi, I. Hukum, F. Hukum, and U. M. Surakarta, “Dibagi Dan Diakui Sebagai Harta Gono Gini ( Studi Kasus Pengadilan Negeri Surakarta ),” 2020.

“Hilman Hadikusuma, Hukum perkawinan Indinesia (Bandung: Mandar Maju, 2003), 7. 1,” no. 1, 2003.