Analisis Hukum Positif Terhadap Pelaksanaan Mediasi Perkara Perceraian di Pengadilan Agama Kota Surabaya
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61722/jmia.v2i4.5609Abstract
Mediation in divorce cases is a mandatory stage regulated in PERMA No. 1 of 2016 with the aim of prioritizing peaceful and deliberative dispute resolution. This study aims to analyze the implementation of mediation in divorce cases at the Surabaya Religious Court from a positive legal perspective. The method used is qualitative research with a normative legal approach, which is based on secondary data from the Case Tracking Information System (SIPP). The results of the study indicate that although mediation has been carried out according to procedure, its success rate is still low. Factors such as the emotional readiness of the parties, the limited number of trained mediators, and the lack of public understanding of the purpose of mediation are the main obstacles. Therefore, it is necessary to increase the capacity of mediators, continuous socialization, and a holistic support system so that mediation can truly function as a means of resolving conflicts that are fair, restorative, and humane in the context of family law in Indonesia.
References
Ach Rois, and Galuh Widitya Qomaro. “Tren Keberhasilan Mediasi Di Pengadilan Agama Wilayah Madura Dan Faktor-Faktor Yang Memengaruhinya.” BUSTANUL FUQAHA: Jurnal Bidang Hukum Islam 4, no. 3 (2023): 424–39. https://doi.org/10.36701/bustanul.v4i3.1116.
Asnawi, M Natsir. “Urgensitas Pendekatan Psikologi Dalam Pelaksanaan Mediasi Di Pengadilan.” Jurnal Hukum Dan Peradilan 6, no. 3 (2017): 447. https://doi.org/10.25216/jhp.6.3.2017.447-462.
Awaludin, Robi. “Penyelesaian Sengketa Keluarga Secara Mediasi Non Litigasi Dalam Kajian Hukum Islam Dan Hukum Positif.” Al Maqashidi: Jurnal Hukum Islam Nusantara 4, no. 2 (2021): 1–16.
Bahrun, Bahrun, Syahrizal Abbas, and Iman Jauhari. “Peranan Hakim Mediator Dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Harta Bersama Pasca Perceraian Di Mahkamah Syar’iyah.” Syiah Kuala Law Journal 2, no. 3 (2018): 371–87. https://doi.org/10.24815/sklj.v2i3.11718.
Devi, Ni Kadek Candra Nanda, and Kadek Julia Mahadewi. “Skema Penyelesaian Sengketa Melalui Proses Mediasi Berdasarkan Perma No. 1 Tahun 2016.” Jurnal Kewarganegaraan 6, no. 2 (2022): 5213.
Handayani, Febri, and Syafliwar Syafliwar. “Implementasi Mediasi Dalam Penyelesaian Perkara Perceraian Di Pengadilan Agama.” Jurnal Al-Himayah 1, no. 2 (2017): 227–50. https://journal.iaingorontalo.ac.id/index.php/ah/article/view/586.
“Khuluqiyya, Vol 3 No 1 Januari 2021” 3, no. 1 (2021): 71–87.
Mediator, Strategi Hakim, Tingkat Keberhasilan, Mediasi Perceraian, Pengadilan Agama, Kabupaten Malang, Bahrul Ulum, Universitas Al-qolam Malang, et al. “Lilemba V DESSERTATION 9 September 2024 (1) (2)” 6, no. 2 (2024): 1–21.
Muhammad Anshary. Hukum Perkawinan Di Indonesia (Masalah-Masalah), 2010.
RI, Mahkamah Agung. “Perma Nomor 1 Tahun 2016.” Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling 3, no. 2 (2016): 91–110.
Sunarsi, Dessy, Yuherman Yuherman, and Sumiyati Sumiyati. “Efektifitas Peran Mediator Non Hakim Dalam Penyelesaian Perkara Perceraian Di Pengadilan Agama Kelas 1a Pulau Jawa.” Jurnal Hukum Media Bhakti 2, no. 2 (2018): 138–51. https://doi.org/10.32501/jhmb.v2i2.32.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 JURNAL MULTIDISIPLIN ILMU AKADEMIK
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
