PENGARUH KINERJA DEWAN PERWAKILAN RAKYAT DAERAH OGAN KOMERING ULU TERHADAP TINGKAT KEPERCAYAAN PUBLIK PASCA OPERASI TANGKAP TANGAN OLEH KOMISI PEMBERANTASAN KORUPSI TAHUN 2025
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61722/jmia.v3i2.8766Keywords:
DPRD Performance, Public Trust Level, Sting OperationAbstract
Public trust constitutes the main foundation of the legitimacy of legislative institutions within a local democratic system. In 2025, a sting operation conducted by the Corruption Eradication Commission against membersi of the Regional People’s Representative Council of Ogan Komering Ulu Regency triggered a crisis of public trust toward the institution. This study focuses on examining the extent to which the performance of the Regional People’s Representative Council of Ogan Komering Ulu Regency influences the level of public trust following the sting operation. The objectivesi of thisi research are to analyze the effect of DPRD performance on public trust and to identify efforts to restore the legitimacy of the local legislative institution. This study employs public trust and legitimacy theories as the main theoretical framework to explain the relationshiip between the performaince of public institutions and public support. A quantitative approach with a survey method was used. The research was conducted in Ogan Komering Ulu Regency in 2025, involving 100 respondents selected through purposive sampling. Data were collected using a closed-ended questvionnaire, while data analysis was performed using simple linear regression, a t-test, and the coefficient of determination. The findings indicate that the performance of the Regional People’s Representative Council has a significant effect on the level of public trust, with a coefficient of determination of 0.582, meaning that DPRD performance accounts for 58.2% of the viariation in public trust. The conclusion of this study confirms that improving DPRD performance is crucial for restoring public trust after the sting operation. Therefore, it is recommended that the Regional People’s Representative Council enhance transparency, accountability, and public communication to strengthen institutional legitimacy and public trust.
References
Christensen, T., & Lægreid, P. (2005). Trust in government: The relative importance of service satisfaction, political factors, and demography. Public Performance & Management Review, 28(4), 487–511.
Citrin, J., & Stoker, L. (2018). Political trust in a cynical age. Annual Review of Political Science, 21, 49–70. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-polisci-050316-092550
Easton, D. (1975). A re-assessment of the concept of political support. British Journal of Political Science, 5(4), 435–457. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123400008309
Lipset, S. M. (1960). Political man: The social bases of politics. Garden City, NY: Doubleday.
Levi, M., Sacks, A., & Tyler, T. R. (2009). Conceptualizing legitimacy, measuring legitimating beliefs. American Behavioral Scientist, 53(3), 354–375. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764209338797
Marien, S., & Hooghe, M. (2011). Does political trust matter? An empirical investigation into the relation between political trust and support for law compliance. European Journal of Political Research, 50(2), 267–291.
Norris, P. (2011). Democratic deficit: Critical citizens revisited. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Transparency International Indonesia. (2024). Indeks persepsi korupsi Indonesia 2024. Jakarta: TII.
Undang-Undang Nomor 23 Tahun 2014 tentang Pemerintahan Daerah.
Undang-Undang Nomor 19 Tahun 2019 tentang Komisi Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Korupsi.
Undang-Undang Nomor 40 Tahun 1999 tentang Pers.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 JURNAL MULTIDISIPLIN ILMU AKADEMIK

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.









