PENGATURAN REHABILITASI BAGI NOTARIS YANG DINYATAKAN PAILIT MENURUT UNDANG UNDANG NOMOR 37 TAHUN 2004 TENTANG KEPAILITAN DAN PENUNDAAN KEWAJIBAN PEMBAYARAN HUTANG
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61722/jssr.v2i1.603Keywords:
Bankruptcy, Rehabilitation, NotaryAbstract
The purposes of this study are to analyze and examine the rehabilitation arrangements for Notaries declared bankrupt according to Law Number 37 of 2004 concerning Bankruptcy and Suspension of Debt Payment Obligations; and the legal consequences of temporary dismissal of Notaries that exceed the time period according to Law Number 2 of 2014 Position. This research uses normative legal research with statutory and conceptual approaches and qualitative analysis as data analysis. The results of the research are first, rehabilitation applied to Notary should be able to restore his position so that this is fairly applied to all bankrupt debtors without exception. The separation between the position and Notary as a person should be considered for the reappointment for Notary by the Minister. It should be emphasized that the focus of bankruptcy is the debtor's assets, not his/her person, so that the Notary's position should be restored; second a Notary temporarily dismissed in a bankruptcy process that exceeds the 6 (six) month time limit will result in the uncertain status of the Notary position and substitute Notary also automatically ends when the temporary dismissal date ends, and the protocol must be returned to the Notary concerned. There is no regulation regarding the extension of the temporary dismissal period of a Notary due to bankruptcy proceedings which implicate the principle of business continuity that is not fulfilled and the principle of legal certainty regarding the status of the Notary position
References
Hartini, Rahayu, Hukum Kepailitan, UMM Press, Malang, 2007.
Ibrahim, Johnny, Teori dan Metode Penelitian Hukum Normatif, Bayumedia Publishing, Malang, 2006.
Shubhan, Handi, Hukum Kepailitan Prinsip, Norma dan Praktik di Peradilan, Jakarta, Kencana, 2014.
Jurnal
Edwar, Faisal A. Rani, Dahlan Ali, “Kedudukan Notaris Sebagai Pejabat Umum Ditinjau dari Konsep Equality Before The Law”, dalam Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan Vol. 49, No. 1, 2019.
Norna Haniaden, Mas Anienda Tien Fitriyah, “Akibat Hukum Debitor yang Tidak Menempuh Upaya Hukum Rehabilitasi Setelah Kepailitan Berakhir”, dalam jurnal Justitia : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Humaniora, Vol. 9, No. 2, 2022.
Putri Pertiwi Santoso, “Analisis Yuridis Terhadap Pengangkatan Kembali Notaris Yang Telah Dinyatakan Pailit oleh Pengadilan”, dalam Jurnal Fakultas Hukum Universitas Brawijaya, 2015.
Ryan Sanjaya, Etty Susilowati, Siti Mahmudah, “Kajian Terhadap Kepailitan Notaris di Indonesia”, dalam jurnal Diponegoro Law Journal, Vol. 5, No. 4, 2016.
Catur Irianto, “Penerapana Asas Kelangsungan Usaha Dalam Penyelesaian Perkara Kepailitan dan Penundaan Kewajiban Pembayaran Utang (PKPU)”, Jurnal Hukum dan Peradilan, Vol. 4, No. 3, 2015.
Peraturan Perundang-Undangan
Pasal 1 Angka 2 Undang Undang Nomor 37 Tahun 2004 tentang Kepailitan dan Penundaan Kewajiban Pembayaran Utang.
Penjelasan Pasal 215 Undang Undang Nomor 37 Tahun 2004 tentang Kepailitan dan Penundaan Kewajiban Pembayaran Utang. Pasal 216 Undang Undang Nomor 37 Tahun 2004 tentang Kepailitan dan Penundaan Kewajiban Pembayaran Utang.
Penjelasan Pasal 215 Undang Undang Nomor 37 Tahun 2004 tentang Kepailitan dan Penundaan Kewajiban Pembayaran Utang.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 JOURNAL SAINS STUDENT RESEARCH
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
